The digital marketing world has not slowed down. Google rolled out its second core update of the year just six weeks after the first, AI Mode hit its one-year mark with some revealing usage data, and paid search started to look a lot more conversational. On the social side, Meta is quietly building a subscription business while ChatGPT ads inch closer to performance marketing territory.

Here is everything worth knowing from this month, and what it means in practice.

Google May 2026 Core Update

Google released the May 2026 broad core update on 21 May, the second core update of the year, arriving just 6 weeks after the March 2026 core update completed. The rollout window is up to two weeks and on the 1st of June it was official over. Early data pointed to significant volatility around 30 May, with some sites hit hard. Google’s description is the standard one: a regular update designed to surface relevant, satisfying content for all types of sites.

The unusually short gap between March and May is worth flagging. The 3 to 4 month spacing that has been typical in recent years appears to be giving way to a faster cadence.

What this means for you

  • Wait for the rollout to complete before evaluating Search Console data or making any significant changes
  • The shorter gap between updates suggests we should expect these more regularly through the rest of 2026
  • Any client asking about a traffic drop in late May should be pointed here first
  • No new guidance came with the update, so there is nothing specific to act on beyond the usual fundamentals

Read more: Search Engine Land coverage | Search Engine Roundtable on the hard hit

Google Introduces Preferred Sources, Perspectives Carousels, and Highly Cited Labels

A significant set of changes to how Google surfaces content across AI Overviews and AI Mode. Google is bringing preferred sources to AI Mode and AI Overviews, letting users spot links from sources they have already selected. Google reports that users have chosen over 345,000 unique sources globally, and people are twice as likely to click through to a preferred source. Alongside this, Google is rolling out a perspectives carousel for developing topics and expanding the highly cited label to more web article links, making it easier to identify primary reporting that other articles are referencing.

What this means for you

  • Getting clients set up as a preferred source is now a genuine click-through lever, not just a trust signal
  • The highly cited label reinforces the value of original reporting and primary research
  • The perspectives carousel increases visibility for timely, topic-specific content on trending subjects
  • This is another reason why brand authority and a consistent publishing cadence matters for AI search

Read more: Search Engine Land | Search Engine Journal on the 345k sources milestone

Google AI Mode: One Year of Usage Data Revealed

Google published its first substantive first-party data on AI Mode behaviour, timed to coincide with Google I/O. AI Mode has surpassed one billion monthly active users globally, with queries more than doubling every quarter since launch. The average AI Mode search is three times longer than a traditional search, and follow-up queries rose over 40% month on month in the US. More than one in six AI Mode searches are now multimodal, using voice, images, or video. Planning queries grew 80% faster over six months, and decision questions starting with ‘which’ increased 40%.

What this means for you

  • Queries in AI Mode are longer, conversational, and increasingly visual. Content strategy needs to reflect that
  • Content needs to answer follow-up questions, not just the primary one. Think in conversation threads, not individual pages
  • Planning and decision-stage content is one of the fastest growing query categories, which is significant for ecommerce and considered purchase clients
  • Traditional keyword strategies built around short-tail queries are increasingly misaligned with how people actually use AI Mode

Read more: Search Engine Journal

Users Behave Completely Differently in AI Overviews vs AI Mode

This data comes from an analysis of 846,000 real Google search sessions. When an AI Overview is present, cursor positions spread across 83% of a viewport compared to 66% without one. Users kept their cursors still 44% of the time versus 29% without an AI Overview, and reverse-direction scrolling accounted for nearly half of all scroll movement, suggesting active evaluation rather than linear reading.

AI Mode behaves like a closed loop. In 88% of AI Mode tasks, users accepted the AI’s shortlist as-is. 74% picked the item ranked first. 64% clicked nothing at all. AI Overviews also collapse the difference between search intent types: without one, only 12% of navigational searchers are still on the SERP at 21 seconds. With one present, that figure rises to 45.8%.

What this means for you

  • AI Overview optimisation and AI Mode optimisation are genuinely different jobs with different strategies
  • Appearing in AI Mode shortlists is a model-layer visibility problem. Appearing in an AI Overview is a comparison-stage problem
  • Even branded searches are now evaluation moments. Users are sweeping the full page even when they already know where they want to go
  • Title tags and meta descriptions are getting multiple impressions per session, not one. Their quality matters more as a result

Read more: Search Engine Land

ChatGPT Referral Traffic Is Up 150%

New Similarweb data shows that since OpenAI began surfacing more prominent links in ChatGPT answers, referral traffic from the platform is up 150%. Pageviews per visit are up 24% and time on site is up 11%, suggesting this traffic arrives with specific intent rather than casual browsing.

What this means for you

  • Clients who are not monitoring ChatGPT referral traffic in GA4 are missing a growing channel
  • The quality signal is strong: higher pageviews per visit and longer time on site suggests this traffic knows what it is looking for
  • This reinforces the case for investing in the content formats and third-party presence that get cited by AI tools
  • Google Analytics now has a native AI Assistant channel group (see below), which makes tracking this significantly easier

Read more: Search Engine Roundtable

Google Analytics Now Has a Native AI Assistant Channel Group

Google Analytics now assigns an ‘ai-assistant’ medium when a referrer matches a recognised AI assistant, and groups those sessions under a new AI Assistant default channel group. Property owners no longer need to build custom regex patterns to separate AI assistant visits from referrals. Google names ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude as examples of recognised referrers, though the full list has not been published.

What this means for you

  • AI traffic that was previously landing in the referrals bucket is now separated automatically, without any setup
  • Clients with custom channel group workarounds can simplify their configurations
  • This is a meaningful step forward for reporting AI-driven traffic to clients in a clear, consistent way
  • One gap worth flagging: AI traffic arriving without a referrer header, via in-app browsers or copy-paste, still lands in Direct, so totals will still be understated

Read more: Search Engine Journal

AI Search Loves Listicles: What 25,000 URLs Reveal

One of the most practically useful research pieces of the month. Evertune reviewed the 6,000 most-cited URLs per model across ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, and Perplexity for March and April 2026. Of roughly 25,000 unique URLs, half were listicles. Across nearly 400 million citations from all models, 63% pointed to listicles. The vast majority were ranked lists such as ‘Top 5 CRM Tools’, making up 71% to 86% of all listicles depending on the model. Cited pages typically ranged from 1,000 to 2,000 words, averaged 18 words per sentence, linked frequently, and used structured headings throughout.

What this means for you

  • If clients want to be cited in AI results for commercial queries, listicle and comparison formats are not optional extras. They are the format AI models prefer to cite
  • Branded, earned media, and affiliate domains were the top sources of listicles cited, pointing again to the value of getting into third-party roundups
  • Content length and structure matter: mid-length pages with clear H2 and H3 structure are overrepresented in citations
  • This is practical, actionable guidance for content strategy conversations with clients

Read more: Search Engine Land

Google Officially Debunks the GEO and AEO Hacks

Google published its official optimisation guide for generative AI features in Search on 15 May, and the most notable section is the mythbusting. Google explicitly states that site owners do not need to create llms.txt files, do not need to chunk content into small pieces, and do not need to rewrite content specifically for AI systems. Google’s position is direct: create non-commodity, people-first content. For Google Search, ignore tactics like chunking content, creating unnecessary AI text files like llms.txt, or pursuing inauthentic mentions.

What this means for you

  • The GEO and AEO tooling industry has been selling tactics that Google itself now says have no impact on its AI surfaces
  • The foundation for AI visibility in Google is still standard SEO: crawlable content, strong E-E-A-T signals, and useful pages written for people
  • txt may still have value for non-Google AI surfaces like Anthropic or Perplexity, so it is not entirely pointless, but it does nothing for AI Overviews or AI Mode
  • A useful document to share with any client being upsold on AI optimisation services of questionable value

Read more: Search Engine Journal

Google Adds llms.txt Check to Chrome Lighthouse

A nuanced one worth understanding carefully, given the guide above. Google has added an experimental llms.txt audit to Chrome Lighthouse under a new Agentic Browsing category. The audit checks for a machine-readable summary at the domain root. Importantly, the audit does not produce a traditional 0 to 100 score, and a missing file returns ‘Not Applicable’ rather than a failure.

The distinction matters: Google Search says llms.txt is not needed for AI features. Chrome’s Lighthouse checks it for agentic browser readiness. These are different concerns for different use cases.

What this means for you

  • This is about browser agent readiness, not search visibility. Do not conflate the two
  • If a site returns a server error when trying to fetch llms.txt, Lighthouse will flag it, so server hygiene matters even for optional files
  • File this as a watch-this-space development rather than something to act on urgently today
  • The distinction between search optimisation and agent-readiness optimisation is going to become increasingly important

Read more: Search Engine Land

Why Splitting Your XML Sitemap Is Worth Considering

John Mueller answered a question about why some websites use multiple XML sitemaps instead of a single file. His answer: segmenting sitemaps by content type makes it significantly easier to diagnose crawling and indexing issues. When one section of a site has a problem, a segmented sitemap pinpoints exactly which content type or area is affected rather than requiring you to dig through a monolithic file.

What this means for you

  • Worth raising in technical audits, particularly for larger or more complex client sites
  • Splitting by content type (pages, posts, products, news) gives much better diagnostic visibility in Search Console
  • No direct ranking benefit, but a meaningful operational benefit when troubleshooting crawl and indexing issues
  • A straightforward recommendation for sites at scale

Read more: Search Engine Roundtable

Google Ads Are Starting to Show More in AI Overviews

Google Ads are increasingly appearing within AI Overviews, which means thinking about paid search purely in terms of traditional keyword coverage is no longer enough. Shopping, Performance Max, and AI Max for Search are the main campaign types to watch, but feed quality, landing page content, and creative all play a role in how ads perform within this surface.

What this means for you

  • Paid and organic need to work more closely together. The lines are blurring and clients benefit from both teams being aligned
  • For ecommerce clients especially, product feeds, landing pages, and ad copy need to be clear, genuinely useful, and directly relevant to what users are searching for
  • Feed quality is no longer just a Shopping best practice. It is becoming a factor in AI Overview ad eligibility

Read more: Search Engine Land

Ads Are Becoming Conversations, Not Just Clicks

Google’s latest AI ad updates point toward a significant shift in what an ad actually does. Rather than directing users to a landing page to find their answers, ads may begin handling part of the qualification process directly within Search. Business Agent for leads, for example, could let users ask questions and get responses directly within a Search Ad before they ever click through to a website.

What this means for you

  • For lead gen clients, website content needs to answer the questions people ask before they convert, including pricing, service areas, FAQs, trust signals, and proof points
  • If ads start qualifying users before the click, what a landing page needs to do changes significantly
  • Worth monitoring closely as it develops. The shift from click to conversation in paid search is not hypothetical anymore

Read more: Search Engine Land

Google Ads Gets a Built-In Lead Management Dashboard

Google has launched a built-in lead management dashboard inside Google Ads, giving advertisers a central place to track Google-hosted form leads, lead stages, and quality signals without needing to export data to a CRM or third-party tool.

What this means for you

  • A useful practical improvement, but also a reminder that lead quality matters as much as lead volume
  • Worth using as a prompt to push for better offline conversion tracking and clearer client feedback on which leads are actually valuable
  • The dashboard could help open that conversation with clients who currently have limited visibility on lead quality

Read more: Search Engine Land

AI Max May Be Getting Better Brand Controls

Google appears to be testing new branded search controls in AI Max campaigns, which could let advertisers decide whether brand traffic is included, excluded, or handled separately. This is still in testing and has not been confirmed as a full rollout.

What this means for you

  • If this rolls out, it could help answer the classic automation question: is this campaign driving new demand, or just taking credit for brand intent that would have converted anyway?
  • Worth checking carefully on any AI Max campaigns once it becomes available
  • Brand incrementality has always been the hardest thing to prove with broad automation. Better controls here would be a genuinely useful development

Read more: Search Engine Land

ChatGPT Ads Are Moving Closer to Performance Marketing

OpenAI is reportedly preparing conversion-focused ad formats for ChatGPT, with formats designed around specific actions like purchases, appointment bookings, and contact form submissions. Advertisers may also be able to use tracking tools such as pixels and API connections to measure results in a way that is more comparable to Google or Meta.

What this means for you

  • ChatGPT ads may not stay in brand awareness territory for much longer
  • If conversion tracking and action-based pricing become standard, this becomes a realistic channel for lead gen, bookings, and ecommerce clients rather than an experimental one
  • Worth watching closely over the next few months. The infrastructure for performance marketing on ChatGPT appears to be getting built now

Read more: Search Engine Land

Meta Is Leaning Further Into Subscriptions

Meta has officially launched paid subscription plans for Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp, with more plans in testing for creators, businesses, and Meta AI users. Some of the business-focused plans could include improved profile visibility, enhanced analytics, stronger link options, and more ways to drive people to websites or shops.

What this means for you

  • Meta is clearly looking beyond ad revenue and building more paid tools directly into its platforms
  • For clients, this could eventually blur the line between organic visibility, paid media, and platform subscriptions, especially if business accounts can pay for extra reach, better analytics, or stronger shop and profile features
  • Nothing requires immediate action, but clients with a heavy reliance on Meta organic reach should be aware that the platform’s business model is shifting
  • Keep an eye on what business-tier plans include as they develop. If they meaningfully improve reach or conversion tools, they may become worth evaluating as part of the broader channel mix

Read more: TechCrunch

Final Thoughts

Step back from the individual updates and one theme runs through all of them: the gap between organic, paid, and AI search is closing fast. What earns you a citation in ChatGPT is connected to what gets your ads into AI Overviews, which is connected to how your content performs in AI Mode. These are no longer separate conversations.

The fundamentals have not moved. Helpful content, clear site architecture, accurate data, and a strong brand presence across the web are still the inputs everything else runs on. What is changing is how many surfaces those fundamentals now need to work across, and how quickly.

At Verkeer, staying across these shifts and translating them into practical action for our clients is what we do every day. If any of this month’s updates have raised questions about your own visibility, we would love to talk.

Talk to one of our experts

Contact Us